Skip to main content
Polar Tint Franchise
813-399-3500 Request Info

Compare

Polar Tint vs Maaco — Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint logo

Polar Tint Franchise

VS
Maaco logo

Maaco Franchise

Maaco is one of the most recognized names in automotive paint and collision repair, founded in 1972 with a large franchise network across the U.S. Its concept requires a paint booth, body-repair equipment, and a skilled body-and-paint crew — a materially larger investment than a focused appearance-and-protection shop. Polar Tint runs six paint-and-glass-protection lines from one lean bay.

Short answer

Maaco is an established, broad collision-and-paint brand (since 1972) with a published total initial investment of $196,000 to $644,000 for an auto-body conversion and $728,500 to $3,994,000 for a ground-up or non-auto-retrofit center (Maaco’s 2025 FDD as reported by 1851 Franchise).

Polar Tint is a focused six-line appearance-and-protection model at a cost that starts below a Maaco auto-body conversion’s and is a fraction of a ground-up Maaco center’s. Maaco wins on brand heritage and network size; Polar Tint wins on cost-to-enter and a lighter operating model.

Side by side — 12 factors

Factor

Polar Tint logo

Polar Tint

Maaco logo

Maaco

Initial investment

Polar Tint’s focused build-out starts below a Maaco auto-body conversion and costs a fraction of a ground-up Maaco center

$136,588 – $259,950 ★ Wins
$196,000 – $644,000 (auto-body conversion); $728,500 – $3,994,000 (ground-up or non-auto-retrofit) — Maaco 2025 FDD per 1851 Franchise, accessed 2026-09-29; verify FDD

Initial franchise fee

Maaco’s fee is slightly lower

$49,950
~$45,000 (publicly reported) ★ Wins

Royalty

Same headline rate; Maaco discounts new centers for the first 6 months

8% of gross Tie
8% of gross (4% for a new center’s first 6 months) Tie

National marketing fee

Maaco’s is reported as a flat weekly minimum, not gross-scaled

1% of gross ★ Wins
$1,200/wk minimum (publicly reported; verify FDD)

Veteran benefit

Maaco’s veteran program is reported as more generous on the fee itself

25% off the franchise fee
Veteran fee discount + royalty reduction reported (verify current FDD) ★ Wins

Required supplier (FDD Item 8)

Glacier Manufacturing (affiliated manufacturer): window film and application tools
See Maaco’s current FDD, Item 8

Concept

Focus vs. breadth — different businesses entirely

Focused: six paint-and-glass-protection lines Tie
Full collision repair & automotive painting Tie

Service lines

Window tint, residential & commercial film, ceramic, PPF, wraps Tie
Collision repair, auto painting, dent & bumper repair Tie

Build-out / footprint

A paint booth and collision equipment cost far more to build out

Film and coating shop; build-out costs in FDD Item 7 ★ Wins
Large facility with paint booth & body-repair equipment

Brand heritage

Maaco has decades of brand recognition

Operator-built; franchising since 2025
Established 1972 ★ Wins

Network

Maaco’s network is far larger and more mature

Affiliate shops operating since 2015 + 1 franchised unit (NV)
Hundreds of locations nationwide ★ Wins

Best fit

Lower-cost, focused film/ceramic/PPF entry Tie
Established, broad collision-repair brand if you want body-and-paint work specifically Tie

Polar Tint vs Maaco

Get the full Polar Tint vs Maaco breakdown sent to your inbox.

Cost comparison

How much does a Maaco franchise cost?

A Maaco franchise runs $196,000 to $644,000 in total initial investment for an auto-body conversion and $728,500 to $3,994,000 for a ground-up or non-auto-retrofit center — Maaco’s 2025 FDD figures as reported by 1851 Franchise, accessed September 29, 2026; verify against the current FDD, where Item 7 covers initial investment — with a franchise fee around $45,000, an 8% royalty (4% for a new center’s first six months), and a national advertising contribution. Founded in 1972 (publicly reported), Maaco is a full automotive paint-and-collision concept: a large facility with a paint booth, body-repair equipment, and a skilled body-and-paint crew.

A Polar Tint franchise opens at $136,588 to $259,950 — starting below a Maaco auto-body conversion and at a fraction of a ground-up Maaco center — with a comparable $49,950 fee and a focused stack of six paint-and-glass-protection lines (window tint, residential and commercial film, ceramic coating, PPF, and vehicle wraps) run from a lean footprint.

Maaco’s collision-and-paint business is a different model entirely — it needs a paint booth, body equipment, and a skilled paint crew. Polar Tint protects vehicles instead of repairing them, at a far lower cost to open than a ground-up Maaco center.

Cost factor
Polar Tint
Maaco (typical)
Total initial investment
$136,588–$259,950 ★ lower
$196K–$644K conversion; $728.5K–$3.99M ground-up
Initial franchise fee
$49,950
$45,000
Royalty
8% of gross
8% of gross (4% first 6 mo.)
Facility
A lean tint & film footprint ★ lower
Paint booth + body shop
Required supplier (FDD Item 8)
Glacier Manufacturing (affiliated manufacturer): window film and application tools
See Maaco’s current FDD, Item 8
Concept
Appearance & protection: 6 lines
Collision repair & auto paint

Maaco figures are publicly reported and may not reflect their current FDD. Verify Items 5–7 in Maaco’s current Franchise Disclosure Document. Polar Tint figures are from the current Polar Tint FDD.

Is Polar Tint a lower-cost alternative to a Maaco franchise?

They are different automotive businesses, but yes on entry cost — Polar Tint’s total initial investment starts below a Maaco auto-body conversion’s and is a fraction of a ground-up Maaco center’s. Maaco is a full collision-and-paint center: it needs a large facility, a paint booth, body-repair equipment, and a skilled body-and-paint crew, which is why its publicly reported total initial investment runs from $728,500 to $3,994,000 for a ground-up or non-auto-retrofit center and from $196,000 to $644,000 for an auto-body conversion (Maaco’s 2025 FDD as reported by 1851 Franchise; accessed September 29, 2026).

Polar Tint is an appearance-and-protection shop — window tint, film, ceramic coating, and PPF from a lean footprint — so the buildout and equipment are far lighter. If you want into the automotive franchise space without a body shop’s overhead, Polar Tint is the lighter, lower-cost entry. (Maaco figures are publicly reported; verify the current FDD.)

The structural difference

Why Polar Tint is built differently.

Six-line service stack

Window tint, residential and commercial film, ceramic coating, PPF, and vehicle wraps from the same footprint, same crew.

Flexible term

A 5-year initial term, with up to three 5-year renewals if renewal conditions are met (FDD Item 17).

Bottom line

Which franchise is right for you?

Ready to compare a focused appearance-and-protection model to a full collision center in your market? Talk to our development team — the application takes under 60 seconds.

Ready to dig deeper?

Get a real model for your specific market.

We'll send the FDD and walk through territory availability. We'll also answer every question you have about Maaco versus Polar Tint.

Apply for a territory Talk to a person

FAQ

Polar Tint vs Maaco — common questions

How does Polar Tint compare to Maaco?

Two structural features stand out. (1) Six service lines from one shop (tint, PPF, ceramic, commercial film, residential film, wraps), all of which a franchisee must offer (FDD Item 16). (2) An initial term that is renewable only if you meet Polar Tint's conditions for renewal (FDD Item 17) — compare Maaco's term in its own FDD, Item 17.

Is Polar Tint cheaper than Maaco?

The total Polar Tint initial investment is estimated in FDD Item 7, and the franchise fee is disclosed in FDD Item 5. Specific Maaco costs are disclosed in their current FDD (per FTC franchise rule). Compare Item 7 ranges and Item 6 recurring fees side by side, and read each system's required-supplier terms in its Item 8.

How does the royalty compare between Polar Tint and Maaco?

Polar Tint royalty is paid weekly on gross sales, at the rate disclosed in FDD Item 6. Maaco's royalty is disclosed in their FDD Item 6, so compare the two directly. Look at royalty next to each system's required-supplier terms (FDD Item 8).

How does the initial term compare? Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint's term length and renewal requirements are set out in FDD Item 17; the term is renewable only if you meet Polar Tint's conditions for renewal. Maaco's term length is disclosed in its FDD Item 17. Compare the two for renewal flexibility and exit options.

How do supplier terms compare — Polar Tint vs Maaco?

Franchisees buy window film, application tools and other designated shop items from affiliated manufacturer Glacier Manufacturing, currently the exclusive supplier of those items under FDD Item 8. Compare Maaco's required-supplier terms in its FDD Item 8, including any rebates or affiliate revenue it discloses.

How does the territory protection compare? Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint awards a Designated Territory, typically the lesser of a population cap and a radius (FDD Item 12). Boundaries are mapped and written into the agreement. The territory is not exclusive, and protection applies while the franchisee is not in default. Maaco's territory definition is in their FDD Item 12. Compare the two directly, and check how each one sets radius size and population caps.

How does the training program compare? Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint runs a 65-hour operator training program: 40 classroom hours plus 25 on-the-job hours, per FDD Item 11. It covers the subjects listed in Item 11. Training is delivered at our Henderson, NV HQ, virtually, or another location we designate. Training travel/lodging is budgeted into FDD Item 7. Compare against Maaco's training time, format, and hands-on hours.

Is Polar Tint on the SBA Franchise Directory, and is Maaco?

Polar Tint is listed on the SBA Franchise Directory (the listing is not an SBA endorsement), so qualified buyers can apply for SBA 7(a) financing through a lender. Polar Tint does not provide financing (FDD Item 10). Check the SBA Franchise Directory for Maaco's current listing status. Borrower eligibility, approval, terms, and timing are determined by the SBA and your lender, not by Polar Tint.

How does the marketing model compare? Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint franchisees pay a local marketing fee to affiliate Frostbite Marketing, which provides local marketing, advertising, and promotion within the franchisee's Designated Territory (FDD Items 6 and 11). The Brand Marketing Fund, which Polar Tint administers, is separate. Maaco's marketing model is described in its FDD Items 6 and 11. Compare how each program works, how each brand fund is administered, and how minimum spend works.

How does franchisee support compare? Polar Tint vs Maaco

Polar Tint's pre-opening, opening, and ongoing support obligations are described in FDD Item 11. Maaco's support cadence is in their FDD Item 11. Compare site visit frequency, conferences, and technical access.

Is there a veteran discount for both Polar Tint and Maaco?

Polar Tint takes 25% off the initial franchise fee for honorably discharged veterans and first responders. Polar Tint is not a VetFran member. It runs this discount on its own. Verify Maaco's veteran-discount terms in their FDD Item 5.

How do I evaluate Maaco vs Polar Tint before signing?

Request both FDDs. The FTC Franchise Rule requires that you receive each FDD at least 14 calendar days before you sign a binding agreement with, or make any payment to, the franchisor or an affiliate.

Then compare Item 5 (fees), Item 6 (recurring fees + royalty), Item 7 (total investment), Item 12 (territory), Item 17 (term + renewal), Item 19 (financial performance), and Item 20 (franchisee contact info for validation calls). The Polar Tint FDD is delivered after the prequalification call at polartintfranchise.com/apply.

Call Apply for territory